The Directory
Find walks near a place, or near you, or look a route up by name. Every named walking route we know of that a public body or association in the UK promotes is here, each with its own code. Or browse by county or by list.
7 routes near Egham in Surrey with a pub on the way. See them on a map
Routes that start within 10 miles of Egham, or pass within a mile of it, nearest start first. Walks near Egham has them on a page of their own.
With a pub within 100 m of the path, or at the start or finish, as OpenStreetMap records them. Each route’s page names them. Pub walks by county.
- SE 1259Egham to Runnymede Countryside Circular WalkA 3.7-mile circular walk from Egham Station, in Surrey, with about 20 m of climbing. About 1½ hours.Starts 0.3 miles from Egham
- SE 1097Colne Valley WayA 5.4-mile walk, with about 20 m of climbing. About 2 hours.Starts 1.1 miles from EghamUnconfirmed: we couldn’t find who publishes this route
- SE 1100Weybridge to New Haw Lock Walk, River Wey NavigationsA 5-mile circular walk from Car Park at Thames Street, in Surrey, with about 20 m of climbing. About 2 hours.Starts 5.8 miles from Egham
- SE 1132Locks and LevelsA 4.5-mile walk, in Surrey, with about 60 m of climbing. About 1½ hours.Starts 6.2 miles from Egham
- SE 1131New Haw Lock to Pyrford Lock Walk, River Wey NavigationsA 7-mile circular walk from New Haw Lock, in Surrey, with about 20 m of climbing. About 2½ hours.Starts 7.9 miles from Egham
- SE 1106Canons and CornmillsA 6-mile walk, in Surrey, with about 40 m of climbing. About 1½ hours.Starts 8.1 miles from EghamFrom an archived page: its publisher no longer lists it
- UK 015Thames PathA 185-mile national trail from Thames Head (source) to Woolwich Foot Tunnel, with about 650 m of climbing. 15 sections.Diversion in placePasses within 0.5 miles of Egham
WalksNational trails
Point at a route to see its name; select it to open its page.
Something wrong or missing?
Tell us what to change about The Directory: a route that's missing, one that shouldn't be here, or a detail that's wrong.